[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cgreek:00111] Re: why killing a buffer?
- To: cgreek@xxxxxxxx, ntakahas@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [cgreek:00111] Re: why killing a buffer?
- From: Kenji Mizuochi <knj_miz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 20:13:17 +0900
- In-reply-to: <200008301308.WAA29594@mule.m17n.org>
- References: <200008301308.WAA29594@mule.m17n.org>
- Reply-to: cgreek@xxxxxxxx
Takahashi-san,
Sorry for the not rapid answer. Yesterday I had to work in the campus all the
day and made a 350km drive from my Berghütte where I stay during the summer.
> > (3) Rapid method of killing the work or work-list buffer
>
> As I wrote, this can be implemented easily, but I fail to understand
> your intention. Why do you have to kill the current buffer to "alter
> the reference work or author rapidly"?
>
> If you are seeing a work and want to open a different work of the same
> author, you just hit 'w' to go to the current author's work list.
>
> If you are seeing a work and want to open a work of a different
> author, you just hit 'a' to go to the list of authors.
There is no other reason than economy of memory.
Whenever I begin to use Emacs for my research, at least more than 10 buffers
are opened, for I always use my own text-database program and dictionary program
for various languages.
And when I refer the Greek texts by using your utility, no doubt will I
endlessly refer from text to text like "net surfing".
==========================================
Prof.Kenji Mizuochi
Meijigakuin University
Tokyo, JAPAN
E-Mail: mizuochi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
knj_miz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
==========================================